Séminaire général : 2016-2017

Responsable (s): 

Séminaire général : C. Helgeson

Undefined
Monday 28 November 2016 - 12:30 to 14:00
IHPST - Salle de conférence

Notre invité sera Casey Helgeson. Il interviendra sur le thème : "Climate Change Assessments: Confidence, Probability and Decision".

ABSTRACT: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has developed a novel framework for assessing and communicating uncertainty in the findings published in their periodic assessment reports. But how should these uncertainty assessments inform decisions? We investigate how scientific input formulated in the IPCC’s novel framework might inform decisions in a principled way through a normative decision model. There are some technical details in the paper (which can be downloaded here: http://philpapers.org/rec/BRACCA-12), but the talk will be mainly conceptual and not require any technical background. (Collaborative work with Brian Hill and Richard Bradley.)

Séminaire général : F. Santoni de Sio

Undefined
Monday 10 October 2016 - 12:30 to 14:00
IHPST - Salle de conférence

Conférence de Filippo Santoni di Sio (Assistant Professor à la Delft University of Technology) sur  "Meaningful human control over autonomous systems: a philosophical perspective »

 
Abstract : Fully Autonomous Weapon Systems (AWS), or “killer robots”, once activated, can select and attack targets without further human intervention. Autonomous Weapons Systems have raised two related ethical concerns: a) it may be wrong to give a machine control over potentially lethal activities, b) the use of AWS may create undesired gaps in responsibility attributions for military (wrong) actions. Governmental and non-governmental actors have insisted on the ethical principle of “meaningful human control” over Autonomous Weapon Systems to preserve human moral responsibility; but they have recognized the lack of a philosophical theory to give this principle a precise content. This paper aims at laying the foundation of a philosophical theory of meaningful human control over autonomous systems based on insights from the “compatibilist” literature on free will and moral responsibility, in particular the concept of “guidance control” as elaborated by Fischer & Ravizza (1998). The paper aims at giving a fresh contribution to computer and robot ethics, by systematically introducing into it an analysis of control based on the philosophical literature on free will and moral responsibility; it also aims at giving fresh contribution to the compatibilist theory of moral responsibility, by elaborating a new philosophical framework for understanding one particular kind of human control, i.e. meaningful human control over autonomous robotic systems.

séminaire général : Olivier Rey

Undefined
Monday 23 January 2017 - 12:30 to 14:00
IHPST - Salle de conférence