Logic, Life, Cognition

Interdisciplinary seminar in philosophy of neuroscience

English
Responsable (s)
KOSTIC Daniel
FOREST Denis

The final session of the Interdisciplinary Seminar in Philosophy of Neuroscience (https://www.sites.google.com/site/danielkostic/topexseminars) at the IHPST, Paris, will take place on TUESDAY  10 April 2018 from 17:00 h. The venue as always is Salle de Conférence (2nd Floor, 13 rue du Four, 75006, Paris).

Interdisciplinary workshop: Levels, Hierarchies and Asymmetries

Undefined
Responsable (s)
KOSTIC Daniel

This highly interdisciplinary workshop will include some of the most renown scientists and philosophers who are working on theories of explanations and on network approaches to levels, hierarchies and asymmetries. This workshop and the subsequent publication of its proceedings will provide a unique opportunity for the direct impact of philosophy on science (through the development of conceptual and methodological norms for understanding the levels and asymmetries) as well as a framework for the direct influence of science to philosophy (through modelling of the conceptual and methodological norms based on actual empirical research).

Seminar on understanding

English
Responsable (s)
KOSTIC Daniel
HUNEMAN Philippe
MICHON Marie
OSTA VELEZ Matias

___ English below ___


Chèr·es tous·tes,

Nous sommes au regret de vous annoncer que la conférence d'Igor Douven qui devait avoir lieu le vendredi 22 Décembre est annulée.

Une nouvelle date est prévue en janvier, nous la communiquerons le plus rapidement possible.

Merci de votre compréhension.

__________________

Dear all,

We are sorry to announce that Igor Douven's presentation on the 22th of december is cancelled.

Understanding from models

French
Responsable (s)
KOSTIC Daniel

Many philosophers hold that explanation is intimately tied to understanding, specifically many hold that the goal of scientific explanation is to provide understanding of physical phenomena or in general of nature (de Regt 2013; Hempel 1965; Strevens 2008, 2013). The views on the relation between explanation and understanding range from largely dismissive (Hempel 1965; Trout 2002) which see the scientific understanding as a pragmatic or psychological by-product of explanation which is not a proper subject of philosophical inquiry, and which should rather belong to psychology; to proposals to treat the understanding independently from the explanation i.e. that there could be understanding without explanation (Lipton 2009; Schurz and Lambert 1994; Newman 2012, 2017). The views in between these two extremes can best be formulated as a claim that there could not be understanding without explanation (Bangu 2013, 2017; Strevens 2008, 2013; Khalifa 2012).

Pascal Ludwig's Talk (interdisciplinary seminar in philosophy of neuroscience)

English
Responsable (s)
KOSTIC Daniel
FOREST Denis

Pascal Ludwig (Université Paris-Sorbonne- Paris IV/UP4 UFR de Philosophie et Sociologie), at the IHPST, Salle de Conférence (2nd Floor, 13 rue du Four, 75006, Paris).

Title of his talk: "Attention, consciousness, and priority maps"

Pages